Valuation multiples, operating metrics, and revenue forecasts for every publicly traded Fortune 100 company across seven sectors. Refreshed daily.
Comparable-company analysis is one of the first things an investor or strategist reaches for when sizing up a sector or vetting a name. Market Comps gives you a clean, current set of valuation multiples (EV/EBITDA, P/E, EV/Revenue), operating metrics (margins, FCF yield, leverage), and simple revenue forecasts for every publicly traded Fortune 100 company across seven sectors. Data is pulled from public filings and market feeds, then refreshed daily so the numbers stay current. Click any ticker to open the company on Yahoo Finance.
Last updated: 2026-05-15
By industry
Each table covers one sector. Columns are sortable; click any header to rank by that metric. The final row is the sector median. An Outlier flag marks names where a key multiple falls outside 1.5 IQR of the sector.
Consumer
Sector pulse: The Consumer sector trades at a median EV/EBITDA of 13.9x and P/E of 25.5x, meaningfully above the broader market, with significant divergence across subsectors as premium-priced discretionary retailers like Costco (31.7x EV/EBITDA, 51.3x P/E) and Starbucks (22.8x EV/EBITDA, 72.3x P/E) contrast sharply with value plays like Target (8.6x EV/EBITDA, 14.7x P/E) and Best Buy (5.9x EV/EBITDA, 12.5x P/E). Walmart's elevated 45.0x trailing P/E despite thin 3.1% profit margins underscores its defensive positioning, yet recent headlines flagging a "troubling shift in consumer behavior" at Walmart and broad retail sales weakness in January align with negative revenue growth at Home Depot (-3.8%) and Target (-1.5%), suggesting that premium valuations on traffic leaders may not be justified given cooling consumer
22 names · median EV/EBITDA 14.2x · median rev growth 6.4%
Sector pulse: The energy sector trades at a median EV/EBITDA of 11.8x and P/E of 21.0x, roughly in line with the broader market, though elevated oil prices have lifted valuations unevenly across the complex. Within this backdrop, upstream independents like EOG Resources and ConocoPhillips demonstrate compelling risk-adjusted returns, with EOG trading at just 7.3x EV/EBITDA and 16.4x P/E while generating a 22.0% profit margin and strong free cash flow yield of 2.9%, positioning them to capitalize on the geopolitical supply disruptions and sustained crude strength highlighted in recent headlines. As Goldman and other strategists increasingly highlight energy stocks positioned for war-related market disruptions, the divergence between discounted upstream producers and stretched downstream refining names like Valero (33.6x P/E, 2.0% margin) suggests institutional capital is rotating toward higher-quality cash generators, making the next quarter critical for those holding leverage-heavy midstream MLPs and refiners dependent on margin expansion.
11 names · median EV/EBITDA 10.9x · median rev growth 6.6%
Sector pulse: The Financials sector trades at a median P/E of 15.4x and EV/EBITDA of 11.7x, broadly in line with the wider market, though significant dispersion masks divergent quality—mega-cap banks JPM and BAC trade at 14.1x and 12.3x respectively with strong operating margins, while high-growth outliers like COF (52.4x P/E, 51.6% revenue growth) and LPLA (27.2x P/E, 41.8% growth) command substantial premiums. Against the backdrop of the 2026 banking and capital markets outlook and recent earnings preview headlines suggesting broad earnings momentum, the sector's valuation appears justified for profitable franchises but increasingly stretched for lower-margin, high-growth names—COF's razor-thin 7.5% profit margin and MET's elevated 14.2x EV/EBITDA coupled with 6.7x net debt raise durability concerns if near-term earnings growth falters. Investors should favor operationally efficient and less-leveraged names like PGR (7.
31 names · median EV/EBITDA 10.9x · median rev growth 12.8%
Sector pulse: The healthcare sector currently trades at a median EV/EBITDA of 13.8x and P/E of 23.3x, positioning it roughly in line with historical averages but with meaningful dispersion as mega-cap pharma names like JNJ (18.0x EV/EBITDA) and TMO (18.6x) command premiums while value opportunities persist in names like HUM (3.9x) and CNC (5.3x). Stryker's recent profit forecast raise reflects strong medtech momentum across the sector, yet tariff uncertainty—highlighted in recent earnings calls from big pharma—poses headwinds for manufacturing-heavy players; notably PFE trades at a discount (8.1x EV/EBITDA) with negative revenue growth despite solid 8.7% free cash flow yield, suggesting the market is pricing in near-term earnings pressure, while high-growth specialty players like LLY (42.6% revenue growth) justify their elevated 25.9x multiple and stand to benefit from reduced margin compression if tariff concerns ease. Investors should expect continued sector rotation toward high-margin
19 names · median EV/EBITDA 12.4x · median rev growth 5.4%
Sector pulse: The industrials sector trades at a median EV/EBITDA of 16.8x and P/E of 29.4x, meaningfully above historical norms and compressed only selectively among cyclical names like UPS (8.5x EV/EBITDA, 14.5x P/E) and airlines DAL and UAL, suggesting the market is pricing in durable growth for quality operators. China's industrial profits surge of 15% and strong earnings from machinery leaders like Caterpillar (CAT at 25.7x EV/EBITDA with 18% revenue growth) and Deere (DE at 24.6x with 13% growth) reflect robust global demand, though the Middle East conflict and resulting oil price volatility pose a near-term headwind to margin outlooks across the complex. Investors should focus on operationally disciplined names with fortress balance sheets—such as General Motors (9.8x EV/EBITDA, 12.6% free cash flow yield, 5.9x net debt/EBITDA) and defense contractors like Northrop
33 names · median EV/EBITDA 15.1x · median rev growth 10.3%
Sector pulse: The commercial real estate sector trades at a median EV/EBITDA of 18.8x and P/E of 36.2x relative to broader market multiples, though significant dispersion exists within the sector with valuations ranging from EQR at 16.5x EV/EBITDA to WELL at 57.8x. SPG stands out as a relative value play given its 12.7x trailing P/E paired with the strongest revenue growth of 13.2% in the peer set, positioning the retail REIT favorably amid recent M&A activity and consolidation headlines such as Clarke's acquisition of Ravelin Properties REIT. The recent leadership transition at Gladstone and emergence of private REITs targeting office-to-multifamily conversions suggest institutional capital is actively reshaping the commercial real estate landscape, which should favor REITs with diversified portfolios and conversion optionality over legacy office-heavy players with elevated leverage like those trading above 6.0x net debt/EBITDA.
7 names · median EV/EBITDA 19.5x · median rev growth 12.0%
Sector pulse: The Technology sector trades at a median EV/EBITDA of 14.6x and P/E of 22.3x, modest premiums to the broader market that mask significant internal divergence, with semiconductor and high-growth AI plays like NVDA commanding 30.2x EV/EBITDA and 34.1x P/E despite 73.2% revenue growth, while legacy chipmakers like INTC trade near breakeven on profitability and AVGO offers a compressed 4.1x EV/EBITDA valuation. The recent rally sparked by TSMC's record quarterly profit and strong Nvidia earnings results has been selective and volatile, as reflected in headlines of "contradictory peace signals" and "AI fervor waning"—NVIDIA's outsized margins (65% operating) and TSMC's dominance are validating the AI demand thesis for core infrastructure players, but software names like Salesforce retreat and traditional hardware vendors like HP (5.7x EV/EBITDA, 15.8% FCF yield) remain orphaned despite attractive valuations. Investors should recognize that
20 names · median EV/EBITDA 16.3x · median rev growth 15.2%
We pull quarterly revenue from reported financials and project the next four quarters using a simple growth rate (trailing quarterly growth applied forward). Bear/base/bull bands use 0.5x, 1x, and 1.5x that growth rate. No ML; this is a level 1 forecast for quick comparison. Below: last 2 historical quarters, next 2 forecast quarters, and implied CAGRs (historical vs forecast) for a sanity check.